![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any premium in value for the variants?
__________________
Successful B/S/T deals with asoriano, obcbobd, x2dRich2000, eyecollectvintage, RepublicaninMass, Kwikford, Oneofthree67, jfkheat, scottglevy, whitehse, GoldenAge50s, Peter Spaeth, Northviewcats, megalimey, BenitoMcNamara, Edwolf1963, mightyq, sidepocket, darwinbulldog, jasonc, jessejames, sb1, rjackson44, bobbyw8469, quinnsryche, Carter08, philliesfan and ALBB, Buythatcard and JimmyC so far. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is on the ones that PSA recognized on the slabs
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, looks like most or all are already known. Thanks for the checklist of them. Have you tried getting PSA to add them to the list of variations? Because if three in the set have the same issue, it would seem obvious to discriminate all of them for the Master Set.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John---the 3 PSA recognizes have been in the Standard Catalog for years and my guess is that is why PSA recognized them. But getting more added to the Catalog now is a dead end ( and Lemke at least thought about taking them out himself). If PSA expands the border gap cards they recognize for 1973, should they start recognizing them for all the other sets ? There are bunches of them.
I do not really care and collect them either way, but the path to getting new variations recognized in the hobby today is uncertain, even if there is an argument they qualify as true variations as opposed to recurring print defects. The 52 House discussed in another thread is a good example. Plus there just is no definition or agreement in the hobby over what constitutes a variation that should be recognized Since I am an ungraded collector I have no sway with PSA, and most Registry collectors I know are not clamoring for more variations to master or super sets. Most if not all the gap cards Cliff posted can be found on ebay or COMC right now, and with no premium. Even when a premium is asked, the same card can usually be found without one Last edited by ALR-bishop; 07-30-2019 at 03:13 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, it's expanding a rabbit hole they've already opened. Here's the 1969 Topps Nolan Ryan.
![]() 1969 Topps - [Base] #533 - Nolan Ryan Courtesy of COMC.com It's up to them, just seems bizarre that they're only recognizing the 3 in the same set, when there are 25 or so from just 1973. Registry guys who want to improve their set ranking could buy them and get them added, then hold the higher positions in the interim while everyone else catches up.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1973 Topps Norm Cash broken border | Laxcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 10-13-2018 12:01 PM |
FS: 1973 Topps Blue Border Baseball Team Checklist Cards - SOLD | quinnsryche | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 03-31-2018 02:44 PM |
FS 4 Different 1973 Unmarked Blue Border Checklists EX to EX-MT | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 12-16-2016 02:33 PM |
F/S 1973 Topps Complete Set (more coming as time permits) (1970 - 1973 have sold) | frankhardy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 13 | 03-03-2015 12:17 PM |
T210 Old Mill Red Border's (& Orange Border) For Sale : | DixieBaseball | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 08-21-2013 04:36 PM |