Quote:
Originally Posted by doug.goodman
Obviously my sarcasm was lost on you, and probably others.
This thread was meant as a celebration of the collection of somebody who has instrumental in f@#king up our hobby.
Apologies to those who don't appreciate my blunt language.
I refuse to celebrate him, or any of the others involved without pointing out their actions (if we are going to celebrate somebody in the t206 world, let's celebrate Ted Z).
Those of you who choose to put your heads in the sand and ignore that the very first card they gave an opinion on was a lie, and because of that every card that followed deserves to be looked at sideways, are certainly allowed to do that, BUT when you post your celebrations on a public site, then be prepared for a's like me (Ryan's term, I prefer "snarky f@#ker") to chime in.
If you don't want to hear from me and my kind, then take it private.
Doug "I wonder how much of his set is over graded" Goodman
|
Obviously you missed the point of the whole thread. This thread was about the cards, not the grades or who graded them. Not about David Hall, Gary Moser, PWCC, etc. We don't want to discuss them.
Some of us want to know what cards Hall has to know that particular cards exist. I am interested in possibly picking up a few cards at the low end of the grading scale, cards that haven't been altered or those graded as altered. The vast majority of my t206s aren't graded if you ever read Ted's threads. I prefer my cards raw, but sometimes buy graded. If someone has details of his collection, particularly rare backs, I am interested in hearing that information. That is all.