Darren's Rovell take on PWCC, etc.

[swarmee]

70ToppsFanatic, when you minimize the scandal to the currently known "500" or so PSA cards instead of inching closer to the 11,000 cards on the tainted submission lists, you lose a lot of credibility yourself.
Did you read the pages where the BODA guys took apart the 1948 Leaf sets?
Say that there were an average of two per card in the sets exposed with visual evidence, so maybe 200 cards. Now I just ran a search of "1948 Leaf" in my google spreadsheet, and it was returned 2074 times.

What percent of those other 1900x 1948 Leafs submitted with known trimmed/altered cards do you think were not modified prior to PSA grading? Remember, all the ones where PSA detected the trimming or minsizreq issues were returned raw.

Maybe 30% which would be 800 total altered?
Maybe 50%, which would be 1150 total? Even more?

How useful is the 1948 Leaf set registry if hundreds to thousands of the cards are tainted?

If PSA isn't going to remove all these cards from their Pop Reports, in order to get them back in hand for review under their grade guarantee, how does any collector have trust in their product?