![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You may be right about that. So back then a trimmed card couldn't be slabbed, it would have had to been rejected. Interesting dilemma.
Last edited by barrysloate; 07-10-2019 at 06:22 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They should have started their grading at a grade of TRIMMED and then go from there. Wouldn't that have been the correct way to do it?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 07-10-2019 at 06:24 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In The Card, if I recall right, Bill Hughes said there was a consensus that they had to grade it given the context as the card being used to launch the business.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Perhaps the Wagner could have been labeled "NR MT/MT Details." |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting T206 Heinie Wagner with missing team name | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-15-2016 12:48 PM |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
Honus Wagner T206 | swschultz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-22-2010 07:22 PM |
Honus Wagner T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-07-2008 03:32 AM |
T206 Honus Wagner PSA 9!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-22-2007 07:18 AM |