T206REF...NEW TOPIC...How do you collect T206's?..Graded vs Ungraded..show your cards

[tedzan]

T206 REFERENCE "Title" bump

[frankbmd]

Aw c'mon man.

Ted, you're just trying to compete with the number of scandal threads on the first page.

[PolarBear]

The other thread is confusing.

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by PolarBear

The other thread is confusing.

Are you kidding....or what ?

The main T206 REFERENCE thread has been very popular since I started it in April 2017. And, I have never heard of any one using it being "confused".

I do not understand your confusion ? There is a clearly designed INDEX (Post #1, and at the top of each page thereafter) that conveniently allows you
to check-out which T206 category that interests you.

Feel free to email me and I'll try to answer any questions you may have..... tedzan11@comcast.net


TED Z
.

[PolarBear]

Not sure this is worth it. I don't collect cards anymore, and to be honest don't really care, but ok......here goes.....

First, the reference thread title mentions "Jamie B" which is some topic buried in the thread. I gather you have been updating the title when new topics are added but can't now for some reason. The whole idea of a rotating title reference thread is confusing and now that you've run into a technical glitch, even more so.

So, I click on the thread, and the first post has topics with links to the posts within the thread. So I click on post 651 "Monster Master Set Achievement" and post #651 is just a header post, the same as post #1.

I gather that you must be trying to create a header post for each subsection within the thread? I dunno. Confusing. Especially since if you click on the link for "Cycle 460 Checklist" which is supposed to start on post #624, not only does it not have a header post, it takes you to post #601 not #624. Confusing.

Just my opinion, but the whole thing would be a lot less confusing and much cleaner if you had a reference thread with links to entirely separate threads about the subject you want to cover. Then you don't have to update anything except creating new links to new topic threads in the reference thread.

Look, I'm not trying to make anyone mad here. Like I said, I don't really care one way or the other, but you asked, so I provided feedback.

[Rich Falvo]

The links are not to specific posts, they are links to the page number that contains the post. The links may take you to a different spot in the thread if you have your user settings set to show a different number of posts per page than Ted. If you are set to show 50 posts per page, the links will take you to the correct page.

[PolarBear]

Originally Posted by Rich Falvo

The links are not to specific posts, they are links to the page number that contains the post. The links may take you to a different spot in the thread if you have your user settings set to show a different number of posts per page than Ted. If you are set to show 50 posts per page, the links will take you to the correct page.

You are making my point about how confusing the thread is. The links are clearly marked "post" and will take you to that post#. It doesn't have anything to do with pages.