![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The population of slabbed cards is a combination of clean cards and (reasonably) well-doctored cards.
The population of unslabbed cards is a combination of clean cards and poorly doctored cards. So it seems, as long as you're at least as good at detecting alterations as the graders are, as seems to apply to an increasingly large proportion of Net54 members, that it's safer to buy raw since the altered ones will be fairly obvious. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Graders should just move to a system where it's slabbed as authentic or it's rejected as a fake. Buyers can then just decide on their own how much to pay for the condition/presentation of the card without the grading company opinion on that aspect.
You should then see the huge price gaps for condition fall and the card doctors much less motivated. I know it's a completely different collecting mindset, but one that can be just as rewarding and enjoyable. In the PSA slabbed photo world, photo type is identified but no mention of condition, alterations, etc. and photo collectors do not put large premiums on condition. Just look at the most expensive photo (to my knowledge) that's sold thus far... Cobb Last edited by Bicem; 06-23-2019 at 10:15 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think David Hall rightly understood on day 1 the market potential for grading not just authenticating. And ironically, they may be better at grading than authenticating at this point.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-23-2019 at 11:55 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even if just assigning an Authentic or not opinion without regard to alteration? At least this way people can be more reassured of not buying reprints.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As an aside I get it, but authentic and altered always sounded like an oxymoron to me.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-23-2019 at 12:03 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
because basic logic dictates: they are altered, therefore they are fake
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
-Authentic (unaltered) -Authentic (altered) -Rejected (fake) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Michael I was thinking the same thing with the Auth alt/unalt but how could we trust them to be able to discern that with all that’s going on.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i agree I like the 3 possibilities...but I also have little faith that they can determine.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Three possibilities means no Registry and less money. Not happening.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what is the recourse. SGC should pay 60k back to the buyer? You guys tell me what should happen as apparently this is going on right now..
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And only Authentic or not, no faith in ability to detect alterations. Won't happen, but this is a grading system I could get behind. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, if this card was bleached, a simple test under a black light will be able to pick it up. If that's the case, the grading company (SGC) and or both are in trouble. If I was the buyer, I'd contact a lawyer and the FBI.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Brian |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS : Joe Jackson 1914 B18 felt. | svtPONY95 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-06-2019 10:41 AM |
FS: 1914 CJ Joe Jackson | calvindog | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 12 | 06-16-2017 02:49 PM |
WTB: 1914 CJ Jackson | ajjohnsonsoxfan | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 05-05-2015 02:44 PM |
WTB - 1914 or '15 CJ Joe Jackson | canjond | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 11-24-2013 07:56 PM |
1914 CK Joe Jackson | Bigb13 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 11-02-2012 07:58 AM |