![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've long known (and opined at Net54) that many high grade cards in holders are altered and that it was foolish to spend long-term big money on them.
But I've never had an interest in that area, and am like many on Net54 who appreciate some honest signs of old age to a card. I remember I had a 1933 Goudey Gehringer that was in such bad shape that I called it "The Devil's beer coaster." Last edited by drcy; 06-07-2019 at 02:40 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: N162 King Kelly in low grade | Gobucsmagic74 | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2018 06:33 AM |
Want To Buy N162 Goodwin King Kelly - Any Grade | chris | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 4 | 12-28-2009 01:05 PM |
Is this possibly unaltered? | birdman42 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-21-2009 06:35 PM |
Looking for lower grade (but graded) King Kelly | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-17-2005 09:07 AM |
unaltered but fake | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-29-2003 12:56 AM |