 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
06-07-2019, 09:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
A few samples from one of those 100 cards for $5 boxes I have handy.
All in inches, measured with a passable digital caliper. Well, nowhere near as much difference as I'd thought. Everything there fits between .013 and .016 There were a few companies that I didn't have cards right near the desk, but they're probably in the same range. 1988 OPC .015 2013 Topps .016 (probably a .001 thick glosscoat 2012 Topps .016 (6 cards, all the same, except one at .0165. That's too small of a difference to put much faith in. ) 1997 Score .014 1990 Fleer .015 1987 Topps update .015 1997 Score .014 1991 Stadium club .014 1988 Fleer .015 1990 Score traded .015 1989 Topps .015-.016 2012 Bowman .015 1990 Donruss .013 1988 Topps traded .015-.016 1990 Topps .015-.016 Last edited by steve B; 06-07-2019 at 09:54 AM. Reason: fixed typo 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1964 Topps Thickness & Color Variation | xdrx | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 22 | 12-01-2022 09:21 AM |
| Ultra Pro 9 pocket pages for patch/relic cards + 70 pt thickness? | Beastmode | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 1 | 08-28-2017 11:07 AM |
| Question about E97 C. A. Briggs Co. thickness | Mainstreetsportscards | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 02-13-2015 10:35 PM |
| Thickness of T201 Mecca Double Folders | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-18-2006 04:58 PM |
| 1915 Standard Biscuit card questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-17-2001 01:35 PM |
Threaded Mode