 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-27-2019, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Personally, I'd leave the mark. Then again I'm a history nerd. I feel like when I buy raw cards I'm buying them exactly as is and erasing something that meant something to the previous owner is like potentially erasing history. Never know what that 457 could have meant to the previous owners (assuming they weren't crooks).
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: T206 Only Moeller Sovereign SGC 80 remains. SOLD | Thromdog | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 05-23-2018 05:29 AM |
| Erasing a light pencil mark, altering in a negative manner? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 06-13-2012 08:05 AM |
| T206 dan moeller psa 7!! Only 2 graded higher!! | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-30-2010 03:20 PM |
| If if wasnt for that darn pencil mark/stain/paperloss... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-22-2007 05:11 PM |
| Does erasing a pencil mark make a card ungradable if the erasing is apparent? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-20-2005 11:47 AM |
Hybrid Mode
