![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I went to a local show yesterday, in Grapevine Texas, and picked up this beauty along with 20 other raw, common T206s. Not pristine but just nice looking cards. Of course none will grade above a 4 (or so) so this isn't going to be a big time pick up. That said, we have had discussions about different alterations blah blah blah. So why not a real world one we can discuss? This card has a pencil mark on back. I have a trusty Mars plastic eraser on my desk that I will probably use on it. It isn't a crime to do that, unless you say you didn't, although some consider it sacrilegious and I can see that point too. So getting the "it is fraud" discussion out of the way, is it ok to erase this mark? If I then submit it what happens if it later gets found with the mark and then, graded, it doesn't have it? And actually, for sake of discussion, that mark might hold it back up to 2 grades!! I could see it being a 1 to 1.5 with the mark and a 2.5?-3 without it. Yikes.
![]() .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally i have no problem with erasing...id surmise many times there will still be traces remaining...BUT...with that fat left border...this card could become perfectly centered with a little help!!!
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is there any reason the pencil lead will further damage the card over time?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I personally couldn't care less about an erasure like that if done with a high quality art eraser.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Erasure doesn't bother me personally, but I understand why it bothers some. The PA find that had been posted here a while back that I ended up auctioning off had pencil on over half the cards. I did not remove because of the differing opinions on such removal. I am sure many of them are clean today.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leon,
No issues here with the eraser method but after you have finished, it will be interesting to view the results and the complete "Moeller Report" hahhahahahahahah Peace, Mike ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Beautiful card, Leon...with or without the number on the back.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My guess is that you picked them up from Roger. :-)
__________________
T36 (1911 ATC Auto Drivers): 25/25 100% complete T36 Master set: 69/100 69% complete T210 Fort Worth Panthers: 14/16 88% complete (need Morris & Weatherford) T206/T213 Scoops Carey back run: 4/4 !00% complete Focus: open wheel/Indy 500 cards (1911 ATC Auto Drivers (T36), 1954 Stark & Wetzel 500 Winners, 1960 Parkhurst Indy Speedway Winners & 1960s Marhoefer Indy 500), match books & post cards. Successful purchases from dnanln, pre1960sets, jp1216 & sebie43; RAKs from CW & LuckyLarry |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes sir and here are the others too which will soon be listed in the BST. I will let the future owner of the group decide what to do on the pencil mark. The "Moeller Report" was kind of catchy, nice one!
I would probably, not positively, erase the pencil if it were in my collection. Sort of undecided on it. My thinking is these were from an older collection as they were in tobacco penny sleeves inside of cardsavers and the sleeves have made their familiar impressions on them. I ousted the old sleeves. All Sweet Cap and Piedy with a plate scratch on the back of Donohue.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 05-27-2019 at 08:39 AM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
None I could tell. Here are larger scans of some of them...
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personally, I'd leave the mark. Then again I'm a history nerd. I feel like when I buy raw cards I'm buying them exactly as is and erasing something that meant something to the previous owner is like potentially erasing history. Never know what that 457 could have meant to the previous owners (assuming they weren't crooks).
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T206 Only Moeller Sovereign SGC 80 remains. SOLD | Thromdog | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 05-23-2018 05:29 AM |
Erasing a light pencil mark, altering in a negative manner? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 06-13-2012 08:05 AM |
T206 dan moeller psa 7!! Only 2 graded higher!! | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-30-2010 03:20 PM |
If if wasnt for that darn pencil mark/stain/paperloss... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-22-2007 05:11 PM |
Does erasing a pencil mark make a card ungradable if the erasing is apparent? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-20-2005 11:47 AM |