 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
05-13-2019, 08:20 AM
|
||||
|
||||
In my experience, the frosting on the face of the slab over the card is not normal, but that little bit on the edges where the seal comes together is very normal. All of my SGC slabs have some extent of that type of frosting, even with the new flips. Good luck if you decide to get it reholdered. I'd just bust it out and keep the raw card.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Tamper Proof are the BVG / PSA / SGC cases? | JMprime | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 11-25-2015 07:13 AM |
| I don't want PSA to introduce tamper-proof holder because.... | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 11-20-2013 06:42 PM |
| New PSA Holder? | rp12367 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-24-2012 09:27 PM |
| New SGC Holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-03-2006 08:51 AM |
| Is this just an old PSA holder? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-22-2004 04:39 PM |
Threaded Mode