Can You Show Me 2 Diff 1948 Leaf Layers?

[RedsFan1941]

as has been covered and documented before on this board, this set was referred to as being issued in 1948 long before a company called PSA was even in existence.

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941

as has been covered and documented before on this board, this set was referred to as being issued in 1948 long before a company called PSA was even in existence.

Hey Smart-@SS

Then explain to every one on this forum why both PSA and SGC correctly identify these 1949 LEAF Premiums, but cannot correctly label the 1949 LEAF cards on their flips ? ?

These Premiums were in the same Vendors boxes that contained the 1949 LEAF BB wax-packs. I know this for a fact (and so do many veteran BB card collectors) since we
collected these cards (and Premiums) back in 1949.

I will reiterate what I said above...."PSA is all screwed-up" regarding the 1949 LEAF BB set. And, the same goes for SGC.



.




Sorry Folks for my "out-burst" here....but, this character has a habit of questioning everything I post on this forum. And, 100 % of the time he is totally uninformed
on the subject matter. Never adds anything meaningful to the discussion. I've had enough of his crap, it has become tiresome.


TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[RedsFan1941]

we have had this discussion before so you know my issue is not the date these cards were or were not issued. It is you continually making it seem that PSA is the one who started referring to this set being from 1948. They didn’t. Back in the 1970s when I collected collectors thought this set was issued in 1948. Price guides in the 1980s said this. You know this but always want to imply that PSA is the author of this mistake. I know you don’t like grading companies and I am no fan either. But there is plenty of fault to find with them without creating stuff. No hard feelings.