![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They've been removed from the book, so they should all be "A" Just like any other cutout/punchout card.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Just like every other card. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Yes, like any other perforated, outlined hand cut card, which should all be graded "A" if they're not in their original form. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So all stamps should be graded A unless the entire sheet is sent in for grading? That makes no sense.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you are that concerned about the cards’ original form, you should be tearing a page out and having the TPG put that in a holder.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Part of the problem is that so many TPG guidelines were established way after the cards creation. What about Bazookas cut from boxes and the dotted line syndrome. Don't most people cut on the dotted line? Wouldn't the perfect cut show half the line? Nope, you get penalized for being logical.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I call PSA every morning before I touch my cards.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Stuff like the Topps stamps? Yep, if it's not the issued panel, it's no better than altered. The ones issued in books should be collected in the books. To me saying one thing is trimmed if a bit is cut off, but another - say a milk duds card or a Hostess card, or a strip card- is fine if it's missing the box or the rest of the panel, is just strange. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are some interesting guidelines for grading hand cut and perforated cards. Personally, as long as there is transparency (correct info too) on the flip, then I don't care what the TPG's do. So for the ones in the original question, as long as they have "single card" or something like that on the flip, I would have no problem grading it.
In other instances, if it is a panel, just state panel on the flip, grade it, and move on. Oh yeah, if cards weren't issued as strips, and aren't hand cut, they shouldn't be labeled as hand cut strip cards. ![]() .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always liked this set. I might just find a book.
__________________
Collecting vintage soccer Collecting pre-war baseball Collecting vintage horse racing (wanted: tobacco cards and pins) Set in progress: 1994 Upper Deck World Cup autographed Set in progress: 1938 Konig Fussball Sub set in progress: 1910-12 Sweet Caporal pins - Philadelphia Athletics - 4 of 11 complete (need: Baker, Murphy, Plank, Krause, Davis) Successful transactions: aro13 edsj commishbob jpaol99 Gonzo, abroom Brianp-beme Dboneesq Chris Counts xplainer Bobbyw8469 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The issue of perforated cards was first addressed in the late 1990s with the Tiger Woods SI for kids card. It was a big dollar card and PSA had the rule that the card had to be torn by hand. If someone took a sharp instrument and precisely cut out the card from the sheet it would be given an A because it was trimmed. It can’t show any evidence that something was used to cut it.
I believe strip cards and Post/Jello etc cards can be graded because they were supposed to be cut. They did not have perforations that could be torn by hand. As long as you cut them well. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bigger scans. Babe Ruth & Tris Speaker have issues. The rest of the set are like Nap Lajoie or Honus Wagner in condition. What grades can I expect on these?
__________________
Successful B/S/T with - Powell, Mrios, mrvster, richieb315, jlehma13, Ed_Hutchinson, Bigshot69, Baseballcrazy62, SMPEP, Jeff Garrison, Jeff Dunn, Bigfish & others |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The Johnson has significant bottom border dings. Most look like they have rounded corners. The Wagner looks like it has a scratch or crease across the middle in addition to a soft lower left corner. These are mid to low grade cards. You need a minimum of an 8 (and preferably a 9) to make it worth while. The PSA 4 Ruth shown above blows any of these away. And that’s a 4. Last edited by Yastrzemski Sports; 04-18-2019 at 11:50 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Post also made duplicates some years in perforated sheet form that need to be pulled apart. So don't cut the perforated Posts just because they're Posts.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(SOLD) FS or FT: Lot of (5) 1961 Golden Press PSA 10's | Slinger | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 11-09-2018 02:06 AM |
Help me finish my 1961 Golden Press set! | sterlingfox | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 08-07-2017 08:18 PM |
Looking for 1961 Golden Press | xplainer | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-30-2015 07:57 PM |
1961 Golden Press 17 Cards | ruth-gehrig | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 11-13-2011 12:14 PM |
1961 Golden Press | ruth-gehrig | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-11-2011 03:43 PM |