 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
03-27-2019, 02:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
50's and early 60's cards were definitely thicker. I think this is why some of them hold up better at least as far as eye-appeal goes even in lower grades. And if you use those Ultra-Pro mag cases, the older cards won't slip and slide around in them the way say - a '72 Topps card will.
I think it's hard to say the '70s were total crap overall due to the cool designs - but imagine how nice they would be if they had the card stock of say - '57 Topps?
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (E Cards) 1900s Early Candy & Gum Cards, 1960 and 2018. | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-03-2018 08:39 PM |
| Mint Condition early Mets pennant(SOLD) | khkco4bls | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 3 | 06-21-2016 03:08 PM |
| WTB/Trade for HOFers and Stars beater condition 50's, 60's, early 70's | almostdone | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-28-2011 12:13 PM |
| 1400~ autograph cards early 80's (Mostly 1980-early 80s)-90's $500 | Sean1125 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-13-2011 11:41 PM |
| Perils of onsite auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-06-2007 01:26 PM |
Threaded Mode