![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep
I was looking at the 60s instead of the 600 in each set So 2 to 3 % Ie..1963. 5000 mantles So should be 5000 of everything Maybe less hi#s more low #s Maybe more mantles were saved but #s left should be close Last edited by sflayank; 03-11-2019 at 02:56 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it has been discussed here before and maybe Dave Hornish had some input. In researching the Topps and Fleer legal battles in the 60s I came across some figures in some published FTC cases that Fleer filed against Topps, and posted some of them somewhere but have no idea where now
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lemke did a blog on it years ago
I recall it was from 59 60 61 The # I believe was 150 million it was based on topps sales reports and revenue Check the mantle pop reports and multiply by # of cards in set Also # went up as population of country grew Last edited by sflayank; 03-11-2019 at 07:51 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow,
I thought way way more then that Didn't somewhere they talked about 30s Goudey cards..and said - 3 million of each card back this those days ?? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The other interesting question that follows from those numbers, if we adopt the idea that 2-3% of each particular card have survived (though I think there is an argument that more of the "stars" like Mantle and Mays survived because they were treasured and/or kept separate of the others), how many would you have to hoard to impact the price? I'm thinking of some of the known examples where people have tried to gather up as many of a particular card as possible. Would you need 2000? 3000? And how would you successfully acquire that many of a particular card quietly? I think that there are lots of each stuck in folks' complete set runs that won't emerge or be available for sale no matter how high the price.
kevin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1...-baseball-card
As of 2014 one hoarder had accumulated over 4k 1964 Topps Curt Floods - still a lot of 'em out there but the price is out of proportion to the rest of the set. fwiw... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Flood guy takes 2nd place to what the guy hoarding the 52 Bartirome has done to the price of that card
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Just like there are still a deluge of Floods out there, there are likely still a plethora of this other card out there. 5K of each card from the 60s seems exceptionally low (even for the higher numbers). 1952 Topps higher numbers have an estimated 5-10K copies that made it into circulation and with attrition amongst collectors, estimates are that between 2-3k of each of the 52 Hi#s remain based on pop counts. I would agree that in the 60s that there were around 250k of each card produced by Topps....however, the percent remaining is much higher than 2-3% |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question on PSA Populations | ronniehatesjazz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-11-2017 11:27 AM |
Trying to figure out Old Judge populations | z28jd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-29-2011 05:56 PM |
Southern league populations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-28-2007 05:31 PM |
UZIT and DRUM Populations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-16-2007 03:50 PM |
Populations of vintage cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-08-2004 05:26 AM |