![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No it’s not. It’s the textbook confusion between tilt or a diamond cut, but not “miscut.” Textbook definition there would be so O/C there is no border on one side, or there is part of another card showing. That of course is the “practical” textbook definition and the one used in the popular culture of collecting. PSA’s actual textbook definition is much more vague, what with the whole “atypical cut” language. That in my mind is just their way of being vague so they can call something miscut and not have to explain. I have another ‘53 Topps card that isn’t miscut but was graded PSA 5 MC even though there is a sliver of the top border you can still see - and the back is not a problem at all. It is at most 95/5 OC but is not miscut. Who knows.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 03-11-2019 at 07:23 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1967 Topps -Diamond cuts? | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 07-12-2016 06:29 PM |
Diamond Cuts and grading companies | TanksAndSpartans | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-15-2015 11:56 PM |
Lets see your ice (diamond cuts) | Ladder7 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 06-12-2012 10:52 AM |
diamond cuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-03-2005 02:32 PM |
Diamond Cuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-17-2003 06:43 PM |