 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
02-02-2019, 11:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
They did not start large. The first baseball subset in 1948 was small, and two of their 5 sets in 1951 were small. The 55 and 56 Hocus Focus baseball subsets were small and smaller. And they would go small with the 69 Supers, 75 Minis and 85 Minis. And then there were even bigger ones, the 64 Supers, the 70 and 71s. But I agree with Dave...and Dave... cost savings and the end of completion led to the standard size we have had since 1957, but for various test designs and odd ball sets over the years
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 02-02-2019 at 11:06 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1975 Topps Baseball - Lot of (69) cards. Make a reasonable offer | Oneofthree67 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 08-26-2015 03:51 PM |
| What are some smaller pre-war sets | markf31 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-29-2012 06:50 PM |
| 1955 Brooklyn Dodgers Looking for (cuts, cards, 5x7, 8x10, smaller items) | jgmp123 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 05-26-2012 12:21 PM |
| now you see it now it's smaller- scan size | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-16-2006 08:10 AM |
| smaller card toploaders? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-15-2005 02:36 AM |
Threaded Mode