![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This one doesn't bother me in the least.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is one my favorites.
![]()
__________________
Collect Vikings, Twins, Vintage HOF and also Off-Center vintage. ***A journey of a 1,000 miles begins with a single card! -Cardfusious Mostly PC with some for trade page: [https://www.flickr.com/photos/187700522@N03/ Recent positve trades with: Brian Van Horn, frank bmd, nkesterke09, ajg, esehombre, mrmantlecollector, KC Doughboy, gregr2,bn2cardz, sycks22 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen worse that don't have the OC.
?? I don't get get it... BEAUTIFUL CARD!!! |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The higher grade the card is notwithstanding the centering, the less tolerance there is for bad centering in terms of the grade. Does that make sense? For example a PSA 8 must be 65/35 to 70/30 centering or better on the front. If a card is otherwise an 8 but is centered 75/25 it's going to be a PSA 8 (OC). But when you get down to a card that is otherwise a PSA 5, the tolerance is only 85/15 on the front. So a card there that is 75/25 is going to be a straight 5 without the qualifer.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah it's still subjective (you will see cards often centered outside the standard on the back, for example - but they still get a higher grade...) but the idea is that if a card is really high end, the centering must be very good as well.
This kind of thing drives me nuts when people online are arguing over why this or that vintage card got a PSA 3 or 2, and someone will chime in "Look! It's way off-centered on the back...that's why!!!" Well yeah, it's O/C on the back, but who cares? That is virtually never the reason that a card in lower grade already gets downgraded further. As if the card would have been a PSA 5 if not for the centering on the back...when often the card in question already has a crease or 3 shot corners or something.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 01-14-2019 at 10:59 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It may be a bit of 'qualifier overkill,' since I've posted these elsewhere, but what the hey...
1969MantleWL500frontback.jpg 1962musial50.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How is this jackie certified by JSA | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 7 | 03-06-2017 06:49 AM |
I'm the least qualified to judge, but... LOL!! | ZenPop | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-13-2016 08:20 AM |
PSA/DNA certified | footlong | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 3 | 08-06-2015 11:22 AM |
A Qualified Peeve | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-18-2014 08:43 PM |
PSA Question re: "MK" Qualified | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-24-2006 10:37 AM |