 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-22-2018, 08:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with the balancing act.
For me it's a combination of what card, what damage and at what price. If it's a really common card I have kept several with paperloss, water damage, writing, tears etc. They came in lots I bought and I didn't have an example, so I just file them away with the others. Probably foolish, as the effort to figure out if a new card is an upgrade is often more than the value of both cards. If it's an otherwise expensive card, any damage is ok with me as long as the price reflects the damage. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Paper loss & Grading | herbc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-09-2015 04:06 PM |
| PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 06:34 PM |
| Flaking vs. paper loss | Orions father | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-13-2010 09:08 PM |
| should dealers disclose paper loss, writing and water damage? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 02-09-2009 02:21 PM |
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |
Hybrid Mode
