![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: My thought is | |||
I like the display regardless of messing the cards up. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
31 | 25.41% |
I don't like the display because of messing the cards up. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
51 | 41.80% |
It doesn't matter they messed the cards up. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
32 | 26.23% |
I don't think they messed the cards up. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 6.56% |
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I voted for “it doesn’t matter they messed the cards up”. Even if the backs of the cards were ruined from being peeled out of a scrapbook or something like that, adding more glue doesn’t help. It’s like giving a drowning man a glass of water.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 12-19-2018 at 08:51 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i was a tad bit harsh...it DOES look kinda cool...but not terribly professional!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personally, I try to keep anything in their current state as best I can. The 'do no harm' thing. But in this case, I guess it depends on the size of the 'drop' of glue. One very tiny drop that fits outside the back border of the card will probably not do any more damage to the card than already exists. One 'drop' in the middle of the card the size of a thumbtack, probably a bit overkill. It should take the very smallest amount to hold them in place until framed.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
His sentences about coupons and Sweet Capital lost me. Needs a history lesson.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
None of the cards look better than about a 2, so I’m not too upset about it. Still, I agree that it’s not a professional job, and it would have been much better to do it without glue.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the display though it sucks they ruined the cards. Don't understand why they didn't use reprints, they could have artificially aged the cards to get the same effect.
__________________
Numerous successful transactions on Net54, just ask for references. https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/gregr2 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I picked this up at a tag sale in CT last summer for $20 because I like the cards and the frame job/matting is just so beautifully done and probably cost 50 times what the cards are worth. This is what I'd call a professional job!
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Calling this piece a “professional work of art” in Chicago may well be stretching the definition, particularly on the south side.
Calling this piece a “masterpiece” on the north side would be considered an understatement though. A Cub fan worried about da matting or a drop of glue - fahget about it? That said a well chewed stick of Wrigley’s gum instead of da glue would easily double the value.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 12-19-2018 at 09:41 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks quite unprofessional to me, and I don't care for it. All they had to do was utilize clear mounting corners, as opposed to compromising the cards.
Bad choice to use the glue, IMO. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are things that places like Aarons use to stick cards that come off without ruining the paper so they would not necessarily be ruined
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even if the look of corner tabs was not wanted, archival framing tape is acid free and water soluble. There was zero research into this plan.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
While I actually like it aesthetically, I could never own that, let alone make it. It was made by a casual fan (and not a card collector) with more money than sense. Happens all the time.
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I vote for No. 5: I don't like the display, and they messed the cards up. If you're going to destroy cards, at least create a good layout. The Cubs collection looks like someone spent about two minutes thinking it out.
Here's a piece I picked up a few years ago. I'm guessing someone — likely a woman — spent an entire winter hunched over a wood stove stitching this thing together. I wonder if she smoked Turkey Red cigarettes? I love how the colors are mixed up ... Last edited by Chris-Counts; 12-19-2018 at 10:39 AM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sorry to break it to you, Chris, but, that was made in 2012 by some punk in Girard, Ohio ![]()
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18 |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"The backs of the cards, along with a short bio of the player and some stats, have coupons for the cigarette who pack they were in; Sweet Capital, Piedmont and Polar Bear"
I didn't know that T206's had player bios and stats on the back.... that's news to me. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Also, he has never sold any t206 in the past. Me thinks photo and cards are reprints. Last edited by xplainer; 12-23-2018 at 12:20 PM. Reason: Spelling |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the display looks nice, although I also agree if you're going to use real cards why not find a real photo?
Regarding the cards, there was a better way to do it than glue, would have required a little more work but wouldn't have been hard. Feels lazy more than anything. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I can only imagine how a double matting would have looked with the cards (expensive as ...). The top matte just showing the color/images and the bottom matte as white, to 'simulate' the actual borders. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying nice RAW T206s! | Steven_T | T206 cards B/S/T | 25 | 01-21-2021 12:12 PM |
FS: 13 Nice T206s | jimmysuitcase | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 10-12-2018 08:35 AM |
WTB/WTT: T206s in nice grade | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-15-2013 01:29 PM |
Fs: A few nice graded t206s | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-28-2012 04:19 PM |
Trade Bait: Really nice T202 Matty, Nice grade T206s | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-30-2006 06:49 PM |