Fake Signed T206 Cards (Too Many to List in the Title, See First Post for List)

[RedsFan1941]

waiting to announce because amazon hasn't yet delivered the net54 double order of tar and feathers

[trdcrdkid]

[hcv123]

I know the focus has been T206. I was the under bidder on this - Never pursued auto's, but bid on a few in the most recent REA sale - won a couple of 33 Goudey's. Thoughts or history on this 1 of 1 - seems too good to be true.

https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...e?itemid=53252

[Orioles1954]

This was owned by a member of the board who's had it for at least 10 years. I think it looks good.

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by hcv123

I know the focus has been T206. I was the under bidder on this - Never pursued auto's, but bid on a few in the most recent REA sale - won a couple of 33 Goudey's. Thoughts or history on this 1 of 1 - seems too good to be true.

https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...e?itemid=53252

I believe the T207 was in a large lot Phil Marks uncovered many years ago. 100% good if it's the case

[T206Collector]

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

I believe the T207 was in a large lot Phil Marks uncovered many years ago. 100% good if it's the case

FWIW - The first time I ever saw that card was on June 24, 2008 on the Full Count boards. It was posted by Chris Bland. Pretty sure he had it until it was just sold.

[Jasonxmay]

I purchased it from Chris Bland last year and consigned it to REA. FWIW, I lost money on that one. I think the high bidder got a great deal.

Originally Posted by T206Collector

FWIW - The first time I ever saw that card was on June 24, 2008 on the Full Count boards. It was posted by Chris Bland. Pretty sure he had it until it was just sold.

[milkit1]

Originally Posted by T206Collector

FWIW - The first time I ever saw that card was on June 24, 2008 on the Full Count boards. It was posted by Chris Bland. Pretty sure he had it until it was just sold.

That card was at the 2006 National. Price: $250
Those were the days

[irv]

Originally Posted by Pat R

I haven't found where he has purchased any other pre-war cards besides T206's.

That is good to know.

Thanks.

[the-illini]

Originally Posted by milkit1

That card was at the 2006 National. Price: $250
Those were the days

I bought it from Phil Marks at that show for $200. I am not sure of the provenance prior to that but I never had any reason to suspect it wasn't legit.

[The Nasty Nati]

This like waiting for Game of Thrones to come back.

Any news? Any new forgeries? There has to be some Goudeys and Exhibits that we can find.

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941

waiting to announce because amazon hasn't yet delivered the net54 double order of tar and feathers

That's BS, the tracking shows delivered.

[Bored5000]

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941

waiting to announce because amazon hasn't yet delivered the net54 double order of tar and feathers

Because we can all agree that scammers/forgers are a great asset to the hobby and don't deserved to be tarred and feathered?

[RedsFan1941]

because we all agree getting your pound of flesh should be the no.1 priority? as has been posted by more than one person, relax, you will have plenty of time to cast stones. it sounds like more important work needs to be done first.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941

because we all agree getting your pound of flesh should be the no.1 priority? as has been posted by more than one person, relax, you will have plenty of time to cast stones. it sounds like more important work needs to be done first.

A voice of reason. If authorities and others weren't already working on this the name would have been revealed already. And any lawyer saying to out the person, knowing the authorities would rather it not be done yet, should know better.

[Exhibitman]

Originally Posted by Leon

A voice of reason. If authorities and others weren't already working on this the name would have been revealed already. And any lawyer saying to out the person, knowing the authorities would rather it not be done yet, should know better.

This urge towards self-important secrecy with every bit of information is an unfortunate ongoing theme in this hobby. I have never even bid on a signed T206, don't have any, and thus have no stake in whether or not Paddy Livingston (whoever that was) signed a T206. But when it comes to exposing crooks, I believe as Justice Brandeis did:

"Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman."

I notice that reporting on crime in newspapers often speeds up the prosecution of crime. Publicizing the name(s) does not affect an investigation into past crimes one iota: the crimes are already completed and the records of them that are likely recoverable from third parties (like AH consignment records) are already in existence. What it might do is prevent someone from getting ripped off. For example, if the info is out there that Joe Shlabotnick is the person who bought the cards under eBay ID "Ohio Forger" then everyone with eBay inventory can block him. Whatever we can do to cut off and frustrate the crooks is a good thing and it starts with information. We ought to be focused on what might protect the most collectors from further scamming ASAP rather than playing Jr. G-Man, and IMO that is maximum exposure of the culprit(s).

But that's just my opinion; reasonable minds may differ.

[uniship]

I agree with everything you just wrote. Releasing the name of the culprit ASAP would help protect this community (and the public).

[Leon]

I am doing what I was told would help the most. IF you don't like that I really can't help you. That said, I will check into how law enforcement is doing on this today. If it is business as usual, which isn't that good from my experiences, then I will release the name. If it is going somewhere then I might not reveal it. I only have marginal confidence in authorities working in our hobby due to their lack of being able to take cases to help protect us.

Originally Posted by Exhibitman

This urge towards self-important secrecy with every bit of information is an unfortunate ongoing theme in this hobby. I have never even bid on a signed T206, don't have any, and thus have no stake in whether or not Paddy Livingston (whoever that was) signed a T206. But when it comes to exposing crooks, I believe as Justice Brandeis did:

"Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman."

I notice that reporting on crime in newspapers often speeds up the prosecution of crime. Publicizing the name(s) does not affect an investigation into past crimes one iota: the crimes are already completed and the records of them that are likely recoverable from third parties (like AH consignment records) are already in existence. What it might do is prevent someone from getting ripped off. For example, if the info is out there that Joe Shlabotnick is the person who bought the cards under eBay ID "Ohio Forger" then everyone with eBay inventory can block him. Whatever we can do to cut off and frustrate the crooks is a good thing and it starts with information. We ought to be focused on what might protect the most collectors from further scamming ASAP rather than playing Jr. G-Man, and IMO that is maximum exposure of the culprit(s).

But that's just my opinion; reasonable minds may differ.

[felada]

Presumable the forger(s) know about this thread by now so I doubt their fraud is still ongoing. However, releasing the name(s) may help uncover more fraud. Once the name(s) are posted it is pretty easy for everyone to go back and search prior transactions. Much easier than searching thousands of closed auctions and trying to match up creases and print marks.