 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is it a true variation? | |||
| Yes, it should be recognized by collectors and graders. |
   
|
19 | 27.94% |
| Yes, but it isn't significant enough to be recognized. |
  
|
15 | 22.06% |
| No, it's just a printing flaw that affected a few cards. |
  
|
34 | 50.00% |
| Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-18-2018, 10:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
The poll was almost 50/50 as to whether it is a"true variation" ( with no definition of what that is) or a scarce recurring print defect. I tend to be in the camp of print defect, since if ( big if I know ) a true variation is a card intentionally changed by the manufacturer ( a definition that seems simple but in very hard to verify in many cases), then I think it impossible to know if this defect occurred at the start of printing and was "corrected, or occurred in later runs and was noticed and corrected, orwas just a temporary recurring defect.
But like many of the contributors to the never ending variation thread, I collect recurring print variants whether the hobby recognizes them as variations currently or not. So, I had to have one  
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS - 1955 Topps Jackie Robinson PSA 4 | DeanH3 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 01-25-2018 12:22 AM |
| FS - 1955 Topps Jackie Robinson | rajah424 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 18 | 05-12-2017 03:39 AM |
| Jackie Robinson 1952 Topps #312B Variation BVG 1.5 (Fair) | flintstone21 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-19-2016 03:55 PM |
| WTB: 1955 Exhibits Post Card Back Jackie Robinson and 1950 R423 Jackie Robinson | CharleyBrown | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-22-2016 11:15 PM |
| 1955 Topps Jackie Robinson SGC 84 | vintagetoppsguy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-02-2013 07:18 PM |
Hybrid Mode
