Stains Get Condoned (SGC)

[Peter_Spaeth]

But still, such a great company.

[rdwyer]

A stain on their reputation?

[1880nonsports]

seriously though that's a terrible picture - without knowing the card with all the shadows and reflections hard to see anything. In any event - I assume it's quite noticeable. From my experience with OJ and other photo cards - image quality and other photo related concepts are not given consideration. Of course staining is a fault and should be accounted for. Can you post a better pic.? SGC is imperfect as is PSA and any other grading company. Does this one really rise to the level of incompetence as some of the many other miss-graded cards we've seen on here?

[oldjudge]

Henry-It is in an auction that ends today so I will tomorrow. I'll post a link then.

[drcy]

Inconclusive at BEST (bolded, underlined and in blue for maximum hypnotic effect) with the above picture.

[Throttlesteer]

So, in cases where an OJ's image is barely discernable, should they be graded with similar scrutiny? I would take this card over a lot of washed out 5s I've seen.

[pokerplyr80]

I have to admit I can't see a stain either. I'd probably give it a 4 or 5 from what I can see in the picture.