![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And he even states that he is selling it as a REPRINT!
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, if you’re in by before 8 AM Eastern tomorrow morning you get to take 10% off
![]() Another note – did you see the negative feedback from the one buyer who bought a fake Wagner. The list price was $5000 and it said they agreed on a best offer. Hope it wasn’t anything more than a buck. If that. Last edited by Edwolf1963; 10-26-2018 at 06:18 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I had never seen best offers accepted on fakes before these. That just can't be a good buying strategy.
![]() https://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISA...s=negative_365 Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-27-2018 at 07:53 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's amazing that the seller magically comes across the top cards in the hobby, but swears the authenticity is unknown. They even suggest a possible PSA 10 on the Jordan. Sure, you would sell a legit, possible PSA 10 Jordan for a few hundred dollars instead of grading ot yourself.
__________________
An$on Lyt!e |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ruth- Fake Flip or PSA error? | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 10-20-2018 04:44 AM |
This Looks Like Those Guys' Card Who Have the Fake T206 Wagner | Brian-Chidester | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-07-2011 06:20 PM |
Yet another fake T206 Wagner out there... | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-24-2010 11:16 AM |
Another week, another fake T206 Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 07-25-2007 09:52 PM |
T206 Wagner Fake alert | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 07-29-2002 10:18 AM |