![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
A PWCC listing pops up but you need to click on the "view original item" link to see the real listing. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I will stand by my assessment that the crease is not present in the image. When I enlarge the image of the back of the card, I do not see the crease. I'm not sure that means anything though, as my eyesight seems to be failing me by misidentifying the seller.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Contact ebay first, then PayPal, then credit card, then PSA (it appears a PSA 4) is where the word "crease" is first mentioned. I might consider taking it up with them. I am not as much as others here for blaming the seller - a relevant question is did the seller know the crease was there. At worst the seller hid the crease in the photo - which is not okay. Most people as you did also rely on a PSA 6 to have certain qualities - a crease NOT being one of them. Most sellers (myself included) do not accept returns on graded cards. All of that said and with the grading guidelines from the PSA website below - I first and foremost see this as PSA responsibility for misgrading the card. Perhaps someone here with experience contacting PSA for this sort of thing could chime in.
From PSA website: EX-MT 6 Excellent-Mint A PSA EX-MT 6 card may have visible surface wear or a printing defect which does not detract from its overall appeal. A very light scratch may be detected only upon close inspection. Corners may have slightly graduated fraying. Picture focus may be slightly out-of-register. Card may show some loss of original gloss, may have minor wax stain on reverse, may exhibit very slight notching on edges and may also show some off-whiteness on borders. Centering must be 80/20 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the reverse. VG-EX 4 Very Good-Excellent A PSA VG-EX 4 card's corners may be slightly rounded. Surface wear is noticeable but modest. The card may have light scuffing or light scratches. Some original gloss will be retained. Borders may be slightly off-white. A light crease may be visible. Centering must be 85/15 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the back. Last edited by hcv123; 10-16-2018 at 06:03 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I also have a PSA 6 with a light hairline crease (lighter than the OP’s card). I missed the wrinkle. Subbed it myself so I know it isn’t tampered. If the card is screaming but for the wrinkle PSA will grade it a six.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agreed. Sometimes they get cards that don't fall within the garden-variety descriptions of their grades. I've had PSA 5's that look like at least 8's and it's because there are light creases or wrinkles, even on the front. Sometimes it took me a couple of minutes and a high powered light to find, but they were there. I think this is a professional grader's worst nighmare - what if the card is super minty looking but has just one or two weirdo flaws...
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-18-2018 at 09:27 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's at least a possibility that the grader was not considering that to be a crease, but an original flaw in the card stock. I've seen this before, particularly on the back of '57 Topps cards - where there appears to be an extremely light "dent" type line in the card. This if I recall was before I had a lot of graded cards, but whatever it was clearly was not a crease. I remember wondering how they would grade.
So no, any PSA-6 should not have a true crease, but I think you may have gotten screwed on a technicality. If it really bothers you and you don't get anywhere with eBay or Paypal (I would bet that you do) then see if PSA will "pay out under the terms of their grading guarantee..." as I've heard Mr. Hall say before. If nothing else it is questionable. It's a shame because that is a nice card (and one I would totally go after, with nice eye appeal but for a hidden flaw...although I would want more of a PSA-4 type price...) Good luck.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I gave in and tried spooning the wife....ugh...she still has wrinkles.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wet the surface of the card and use a spoon to press the crease out of the card.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks. Sounds crazy to me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crease free? | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-19-2013 04:14 PM |
Our friend the crease. | atx840 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 03-14-2013 10:27 AM |
T206 CREASE(s) CONTEST | Craig M | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 02-07-2013 09:19 AM |
A crease's effect on card value | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-26-2004 06:43 AM |
Crease or paper loss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-01-2003 07:10 PM |