 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
09-07-2018, 07:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Ever since I started collecting about 10 years ago, I've always thought there was one huge flaw in the grading system. The second lowest grade is GOOD- that makes absolutely zero since. You got practically the upper half of the system with the word mint in it. Everything 7-10 looks the same to me and that's why I just stick with 3s and under lol
With that said, there's no way this card should grade a 10, especially after looking at the back
__________________
Collecting nice-looking but poorly graded cards of legendary HOFers Last edited by vintagerookies51; 09-07-2018 at 07:49 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Who is the LEAST deserving player in the HOF in the T206 set | bbcard1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 09-12-2016 08:36 PM |
| Why would someone Leave a non deserving Low DSR? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 11-25-2012 04:01 PM |
| The most deserving 19th Century Player not yet enshrined in the HOF | martyogelvie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 10-17-2010 07:35 PM |
| Think theres deserving 19th century players not in the HOF | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 06-06-2005 12:39 PM |
Threaded Mode