 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-06-2018, 11:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I remember a friend of mine and I looking up seasons where guys had the lowest ratio of RBI to HR. Bonds I think had one under 2. Might have been the 73HR season.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.  My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 09-06-2018 at 11:10 AM. 
|
|
#2
09-06-2018, 11:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The 40 HR guys in the 50s and 60s generally had over 100 RBIs though and many had 120. The Red Sox of 2018 currently have eight players ahead of Judge in RBIOTYs.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
