![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I cannot afford it. I do not know T206s well either so with those disclosures my worthless opinion is that it is not a 10. I see what appears to be a tobacco stain too. My hunch is that if taken out of the holder it would not come back as a 10 the next time. If it were my card however I would not see any of the flaws we have pointed out.
In a perfect world I think I would prefer to buy a card that I feel would grade the same way if submitted again. I know not all collectors, especially those at the top of the food chain, care about that.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
https://www.psacard.com/resources/gr...andards#detail Quote:
I am not suggesting it isn't possible, I would just like to know how cards like these were saved/preserved when I highly doubt any type of card savers/sheets were available way back then. Can I assume most were placed between pages of thick books? I'd honestly like to know what collectors did way back then.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 Last edited by irv; 09-05-2018 at 01:09 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMO, there is no way this should be a 10, especially with the back being so far off-center and stained.
DJ
__________________
Current Wantlist: E92 Nadja - Bescher, Chance, Cobb, Donovan, Doolan, Dougherty, Doyle (with bat), Lobert, Mathewson, Miller (fielding), Tinker, Wagner (throwing), Zimmerman E/T Young Backrun - Need E90-1 E92 Red Crofts - Anyone especially Barry and Shean |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do they not consider the centering on the back when making their assessment? I can’t believe that they would not. We can all agree that the card doesn’t deserve a 10, but some guy won’t care and will drop absurd money on the flip anyway. It’s madness.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even if this card was spot on, perfect centering on the back, 8 at best should be the grade.,...
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Is it reasonable to question then how so many T206's remain to this day in pristine or near pristine condition? Yes, that's a fair question. There have been some finds over the years of pristine cards, so some of the 8's, 9's and 10's are perfectly original. But not all. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who is the LEAST deserving player in the HOF in the T206 set | bbcard1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 09-12-2016 08:36 PM |
Why would someone Leave a non deserving Low DSR? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 11-25-2012 04:01 PM |
The most deserving 19th Century Player not yet enshrined in the HOF | martyogelvie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 10-17-2010 07:35 PM |
Think theres deserving 19th century players not in the HOF | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 06-06-2005 12:39 PM |