 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-29-2018, 09:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I'm thinking:
1: POOR+ : Poor, complete card but with nice eye appeal 0.5: POOR: Poor, complete card in bad shape Authentic: Card that is missing parts or has alterations Saying that, for the registry, Authentic is already given 0.5 points, so it pretty much rules out the above. 
|
|
#2
08-29-2018, 11:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA new grading system??? | V117collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-25-2012 05:02 PM |
| SGC Grading System | MattyFan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-06-2011 07:39 PM |
| Is the Grading System Broken? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 328 | 07-11-2007 10:09 PM |
| One of the things that's wrong with the current grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-28-2007 08:04 AM |
| A new grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-15-2006 12:40 PM |
Hybrid Mode
