![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can't speak to the proper way to submit at the National for a quick turn around but I do think it is just additional evidence things are not going well from an operational standpoint with them.
I would be so pissed off if I sent in cards to a company and they charged me upfront and we are now past 12 months and they still have my cards. If they were to go BK you would have very little chance of getting the grading fees back and I would honestly be petrified about getting the cards. To a lot of us that submit cards for grading many of them you can't easily replace and in some cases ever so it isn't just a monetary issue. Last edited by Dpeck100; 08-28-2018 at 06:58 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
True, the taking the funds for a year and "holding cards hostage" thing is crazy. Surprised there hasn't been a class action lawsuit yet. It's not like all these major submitters aren't either on here, blowout, or CU.
COMC stopped submitting to BGS months ago.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have been tracking and buying some modern cards recently and was surprised at the premium BGS gets vs. PSA. In some cases it's 2x for a BGS 10 vs. a PSA 10. And if you have a BGS black label (which is all 4 sub grades with a 10) it's even more. It's my impression that BGS has a huge market share advantage over PSA in modern cards. If BGS implodes that would be really bad for modern and really bad for the health of the hobby in general.
btw for you vintage guys, I learned this terminology recently...(many of you might already know this but thought I would share in case you were like me with your head in the sand on all things shiny) BGS 9.5 are called "Gems" and BGS 10's are "Dimes" BGS grades on 4 sub grades for Centering, Corners, Edges and Surface A minimum Gem is 3 9.5 sub grades and 1 9 sub. Cards with "9" centers are worth the least and many shun them. BGS 9.5 with 9.5 for all sub grades is called "A Quad or True Gem" and get a premium BGS 9.5 with all 9.5 sub grades and either 1 or 2 10 sub grades is called "true gem plus or monster subs" As you can imagine subs matter in particular on low pop and rare cards
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #7 all-time. Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 08-28-2018 at 08:17 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
BGS 9.5 is the equivalent of PSA 10; BGS 10 and Black Label are very rare and essentially gimmicks IMO. PSA 10s as far as I can tell substantially outsell even quad 9.5s on cards like Trout rookies and probably everything else. Look it up.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 08-28-2018 at 08:35 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
PSA is half the price and outsells them on the 10/9.5 for the vast majority of items. And yes, some people pay others to clean their shiny modern cards for them, mostly taking off dust and fingerprints, since those can lead to lower grades on chrome cards.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Depending on how it works, the year wait could be beneficial - if somebody submitted an auto-refractor-thingy of Juan Soto (just an example, not even sure there was one last year) last November, they probably got in on a lower tier of the fees. Of course, they missed out on potentially cashing in during the mean time. And anybody who submitted cards of Robbie Cano or some others probably missed out on some decent money by not getting their slabs back quickly. The whole thing is crazy. I would never ever send my cards away knowing I wouldn't get them back for a year, much less a few months. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Turnaround Time. | NaplesGeezer | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 2 | 03-24-2018 05:30 PM |
Kudos to PSA Turnaround Time | Joe Hunter | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 13 | 01-06-2018 10:54 PM |
Best/Worst comm.rates +turnaround time major houses | cookie | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 1 | 05-27-2017 12:49 PM |
PSA turnaround time faster than ever ! | Mickey Mays | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 03-19-2017 02:37 PM |
JSA turnaround time | mark evans | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 09-17-2012 03:40 PM |