![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: What do you think of the new SGC flip/case? You can select more than one answer. | |||
Overall I like the new SGC flip/case |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
68 | 34.00% |
I like the new black label |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 18.00% |
I like the new large numbering system |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 9.50% |
Overall I don't like the new SGC flip/case |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
52 | 26.00% |
I don't like the new black label, I miss the green label |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 18.00% |
I don't like the new large numbering system |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
61 | 30.50% |
I could care less |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 13.50% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 200. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are some pics. Post any if you've got 'em. Love to hear people's opinions on this pretty radical shift. No more iconic SGC green and much bigger numbering.
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/schneids |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The new flips are actually growing on me. I don't mind the black ones, I didn't like the colored ones when I saw them but haven't seen many examples yet. And I really don't like the white one for the autos. But the black doesn't bother me any more.
I don't like the huge numbers though. I'm still not in favor of those. When I first saw the initial thread about the changes and the pics that were posted then, I absolutely hated the change. So I'm pretty glad that I'm not as bothered by them any more.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The last choice within the poll may be confusing to people, as to this point nobody has chosen it. It reads "I COULD care less", which actually means you do care to some extent.
If it read "I COULDN'T care less", then it would indicate that you truly don't care. I believe that's what the OP meant to convey, but perhaps he can clarify. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like them overall but like a lot of folks, I think the huge number detracts from the appeal. But seeing as I don't collect very many graded cards and have only done a couple of submissions I'm really not the target market.
__________________
"When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea. Thank you very much." -Eric Cantona |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you could care less that means you do care. The last option should be I couldn't care less.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don’t mind the large numbers although I liked the dual number on the old flips. The green made them standout but I’m fine with black. What I don’t love are the autograph flips. For some reason the big A doesn’t look good to me. I’m also not worried about consistency in my flip labels expect I have an entire player run autographed (that I want to display) with the red flips and I had one left to submit. This will stick out like a sore thumb.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I never thought the quirky numbering system made any sense, so I think the move to a more standard system is good. I really don't care what the flip looks like.
Do people plan to get all their cards reholdered?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 08-09-2018 at 07:32 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not me. I already allocate too much money to grading that could be spent otherwise. No need to spend more money on new holders. 15 years from now when they change again do you reholder again? Seems crazy to me.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/schneids |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't particularly care what the flip looks like. I care more about accuracy and consistency in the grading process.
__________________
Numerous successful transactions on Net54, just ask for references. https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/gregr2 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What I think gets lost in the "uniformity" complaints is that there won't be any uniformity if they don't market themselves better to the modern card market. If the company goes away you will have no one to complain about "uniformity" to, the decision will be made for you by fate.
If you really want SGC to stay around you should be happy they are making an attempt to grow their market.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cases. Holders? Cases... | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 69 | 02-07-2017 05:43 PM |
Cracking out BVG cases | Edwolf1963 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-16-2016 06:52 PM |
Cases | mwbeatles | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-02-2016 10:03 AM |
Cases | mwbeatles | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-29-2016 04:00 PM |
New SGC cases? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-11-2007 05:33 AM |