 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-07-2018, 11:15 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I would expect a 4.5 to 5.5 if I submitted it. If the grader thinks there is paper loss, it could be worse. I have a PSA 4 Mantle with a black smudge in the corner that was not given a qualifier.
Because of the front centering and the "notch" on the top border on the back, maybe a straight 6 would be the highest without the surface flaw you're talking about.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 08-07-2018 at 11:17 AM. 
|
|
#3
08-07-2018, 12:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No that is not a crease.
Hopefully if it does grade somewhere in the 4 or 4.5 neighborhood it will sell for more because of the eye appeal. Maybe?
|
|
#4
08-07-2018, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know rest of card isn't bad, corners are good, color is good and stock is bright, maybe a bleed of green on the back could ber a 5-5.5 as is.. IMO
__________________
Successful B/S/T deals with asoriano, obcbobd, x2dRich2000, eyecollectvintage, RepublicaninMass, Kwikford, Oneofthree67, jfkheat, scottglevy, whitehse, GoldenAge50s, Peter Spaeth, Northviewcats, megalimey, BenitoMcNamara, Edwolf1963, mightyq, sidepocket, darwinbulldog, jasonc, jessejames, sb1, rjackson44, bobbyw8469, quinnsryche, Carter08, philliesfan and ALBB, Buythatcard and JimmyC so far.
|
|
#5
08-07-2018, 03:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the grader at PSA deems it to be an erasure, it could get a 5(MK) or possibly even just AUTHENTIC ALTERED.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#6
08-07-2018, 04:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice card
When it comes to graded cards, I prefer SGC so I am by no means an expert in PSA grading guidelines. I also can see anything from Authentic Altered to 5 or 5.5. I would suggest affixing an extremely eye catching sticker on the card saver you submit it in proclaiming its tremendous eye appeal. You may be able to distract them away from the flaw. All kidding aside, that’s a great card. Good luck with it.
|
|
#7
08-07-2018, 05:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would guess a 4. Probably wouldn't get a half grade bump with the surface flaw and centering, but it's a nice looking card.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| poor 1933 goudey ruth opinion | richardcards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 03-30-2016 07:19 PM |
| 1933 goudey Sports King Ty Cobb Grading Opinions?? | sportscollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 05-11-2013 03:39 PM |
| FS: 1928 Harrington's Babe Ruth and 1933 Goudey Ruth #149 | piecesofthegame | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2013 05:50 AM |
| SALE: 1933 Goudey Ruth SGC 10 & 1932 Sanella Ruth PSA 6 | iggyman | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-01-2011 05:11 PM |
| 1933 Goudey Opinion Needed | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 10-01-2008 06:22 PM |
Hybrid Mode
