![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Should PSA adopt a qualifier for exceptional centering? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
26 | 13.40% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
168 | 86.60% |
Voters: 194. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No. If I can't judge centering for myself, I don't need to be spending $ on cards. Also, if a TPG is going to add a qualifier for exceptional centering, we might as well do it Beckett style a break down all of a card's aspects.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Last edited by vintagebaseballcardguy; 08-06-2018 at 07:54 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I voted no.
If a card grades an 8 in most categories, for example, but is exceptional in one (or more) particular area (centering, registration, color, corners, etc), but is not quite a 9...it should then grade an 8.5 (in theory). This is what half grades are for. Last edited by MVSNYC; 08-05-2018 at 07:24 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Absolutely not. Centering is a criteria, just like corners, creases, etc. It should be baked into the grade. You start separating those out and the whole system becomes even more of a mess than it already is.
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The simpler the system the better. We can look at a PSA 10 and see with our eyes whether it's 50/50 or 55/45. And if we want to know if it's 50/50 instead of 51/49 then eye roll emoji.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm in favor of less qualifiers vs. more. So I would say 'no'.
jeff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I vote yes. Why, because it's starting to seem like the average collector has no clue and needs to be spoon fed.
Last edited by PiratesWS1979; 08-05-2018 at 08:34 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I voted no.
Instead, put why it's graded what it is on the back of the flip.
__________________
Need a spreadsheet to help track your set, player run, or collection? Check out Sheets4Collectors on Etsy. https://www.etsy.com/shop/Sheets4Collectors - Grover Hartley PC - Jim Thome PC - Cleveland Sports Hall of Fame |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes definitely, and there should also be qualifiers to for when the sky is blue, the grass is green and when the water is wet for collectors who can't determine those things either.
At some point-- say when he has to be told that a card is rectangular or the 1971 Topps borders are black or that a card is perfectly centered or that an autograph is Mint--, that a collector doesn't deserve to own a card. "Sorry, you're too stupid. Please, join another hobby." Last edited by drcy; 08-06-2018 at 01:53 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As I was voting “no” I was mentally preparing the written defense of my decision. No need for me to explain my decision now, since MVSNYC suppliied my exact theory. In fact, I couldn’t have said it any better. IMO that’s what the half grade should be for. A technical 7 with damn near perfect centering should become a 7.5... not a 7 with a goofy little sticker.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No. If my net54 memory serves me correctly, some collectors even have differing opinions on what is considered centered for certain issues, such as T206. Is the name part of the border (my choice), or does the border start after the name?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High end T206s with exceptional eye appeal. FS | JasonD08 | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-11-2016 03:52 PM |
Should PSA/SGC have a qualifier for Centering? | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 10-22-2011 09:57 AM |
Centering preferences - Poll | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 10-06-2010 10:01 PM |
Like The Yankees I Pay Top Dollar For The Exceptional Types | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 12-24-2005 12:43 PM |
Exceptional Gestures by Others - Share Your Stories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 12-06-2005 09:44 PM |