![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, they said they randomized them for greater privacy.
__________________
My flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/140288876@N04/albums |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The sequential cert and submission numbers made it very easy to ID bad card batches, you no longer have that tool to weed out some problematic cards.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
excellent point
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the question is how they're going to square it with the current listing, both in the registry and pop report.
1) If they do a straight reholder, will the new flip have a new cert number? 2) Will it if they do a review submission where the card is being regraded? 3) Can both number types live together in harmony in their database?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|