![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 2 cents: First off I think that some of the designs particularly late 60's early 70's were lackluster. Also in the 50's and 60's baseball featured sets that were 400-500+ in number allowing for more player representation. Football sets were limited to lower numbers and with team cards, 8-12 players out of 40 or so per team. I also think that in later sets, the fact that the card companies did not have the rights to have team logos on helmets and airbrushed them out added to the quality of the card. Don't get me wrong, I have several pre 70 football sets and enjoy them, it just the quality and effort didn't seem to be a main focus. I think the topps/opc hockey sets are better than the football output in these years. comments opinions welcome. billp
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aren't these the same card? | xplainer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-11-2015 08:45 PM |
Are There Any Autographed Football Card Collectors Out There? | Julian Wells | Football Cards Forum | 10 | 07-12-2012 08:55 PM |
Baseball Art II (and Football) and why things aren't always as they seem Lelands Jan 2007 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 02-25-2007 08:41 AM |
Those caramel card prices aren't going away | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-18-2005 10:08 AM |
Card collectors aren't alone | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-17-2004 06:05 PM |