![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I started a collection of T206 HOF's almost 4 years ago. I started with the action posses (which I liked better) with a cross section of different rare and semi rare backs. After acquiring all the action posses and doubles I started to look for portraits which in almost every case were substantially more money than the action pose of the same player in the same grade. It also became apparent that nobody I traded with valued the action posses as high as the portraits regardless of the population. The population for the Green Cobb Portrait is about the same as the Bat On pose. No sense in comparing those prices The first portrait I bought was the Red Cobb on ebay 3 years ago in a 2.5 for under 890.00. It has a Polar Bear back and has gone up considerably in value. Looking back from a financial standpoint I wish I collect the portraits first. The good news is I am only a few cards away from the HOF set.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: HOF Portrait & Poses + Cy raw/low-grade | Michael Peich | T206 cards B/S/T | 2 | 11-12-2017 11:44 AM |
T206 Cobb green portrait, why is it so much higher than other poses? | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-11-2013 06:19 PM |
Wanted: T206 SGC 50 Polar Bear backs with non-portrait poses | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-18-2006 10:17 PM |
t206 Poses | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 11-29-2005 08:00 AM |
Values for T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-11-2003 08:50 PM |