|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Prolly just o/c.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
from OGK
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
So a 10 is still poor. Or is it just the 40 years of seeing poor abbreviated as PR in hobby publications.
Also, that's one UGLY label. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's horrible.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't care what the flip looks like as long as they pick one and stick to it. I understand PSA changing theirs 3 or 4 time since the new slab but don't want that done to the slabs I collect.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think I like the old flips better. Maybe this style will grow on me.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not a fan of the new label, who’s idea was it to change ?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like the black as it doesn't clash with any color of a card, unlike the red PSA flips. I like the green flips as well but I think the black flip will focus more attention on the card than the flip.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
When someone who knows nothing about cards sees an SGC card at someone's house it helps complement the card as a display piece rather than "oh that red flip". |
![]() |
|
|