![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1955? I'd have been careful to not prevent my parents from gettting together at the "Enchantment Under the Sea" dance.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, when I was 8 I remember liking Topps cards much more than the Bowman ones so I'd have probably picked up the Topps pack. I didn't really start to appreciate the Bowman cards until much later in life. Now I really like them a lot.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, I'd probably be drawn more to the Bowman package. It's more visually exciting. I would probably have liked the T.V. idea as a kid too.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bowman and it's not even close. They are a beautiful design and the 55 Topps are seriously horrible. Not a fan of the horizontal design except for the 55 Bowman cards.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bowman under the rules . Topps with my adult mind. But yeah I would have liked Bowman better as a kid for sure.
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I would have gone with Bowman, especially if I knw the design looked like that new Television thing
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Pretty sure I would have chosen Bowman simply due to there being more cards per pack. However, it would have ended as soon as I started getting cards of umpires, to my 5 year old mind this would have been an indignation I could not have stood for.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By the way, a big thanks to David for posting the 55 packs.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Wayback Machine only goes back as far as 1966, when I was 13, and still remember where I snagged my '55 Bowman Mantle - unfettered by wax - for a quarter (BTW, the Mays was a dime).
Last edited by Paul S; 06-09-2018 at 03:55 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I recently showed my father (born 1947) my HOF card collection for the first time. He really enjoyed my cards, but when I showed him my 1955 Bowman cards his eyes lit up like fireworks! He was giggling like a kid when he saw the umpire cards like Nestor Chylak and Jocko Conlan. Haha, it was like as if he just took a time warp trip.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would have left the 5 & Dime store and scored me some crack on the street. Crack cost less back in the day...
![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crack still might be cheaper than some packs today.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I lived this choice. The corner grocery store was a block away in Scottsbluff, NB. by the time I got there with my nickel, Bobby Forrest (whose dad was the Cadillac dealer) usually had bought the boxes of Topps. I did buy a Topps pack (1955) that I remember well, because in it was a green 1954 Topps #50 Yogi Berra. I still haven’t figured that out. This particular store never stocked Bowman. If they had, I would have bought those.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems that geographic distribution quirks may play a considerable role in this contest. On the other hand, I wonder if the "poll" might be tainted by more recent bias in the hobby toward Topps and against Bowman. In July of 1955, however, I don't think most kids were even paying much attention to cards, as summertime diversions of other sorts were more attractive. Like most kinder of that time period, I had collected cards as a seven to ten-year-old, and my fondest recollection is of the 1953 sets from both companies. But, by the spring of '55, my interests had turned to eleven-year-old girls and sports generally, so that the only card set I actually could later recall from that year is the Bowman, probably because of its unusual design, plus the fact that Bowman had to some extent cornered the card market in my small hometown.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At the beginning of the year it would have been Topps. After seeing Bowman's improvement over 1954 it would have depended on my mood.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So this thread would be lost on the lad I was, with my hobby horse and Daniel Boone hat. And a fistful of melting ice cream cone. Now, If I woulda been 8, the Bowman TV cards hands down.
__________________
T206 156/518 second time around R312 49/50 1959 Topps 568/572 1958, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1957, 1956… ...whatever I want |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Bowmans, hands down. One of the cleverest set designs of all time. Unfortunately I wasn't born until 1977...:-(
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To be honest I bought plenty of cards in 1955. Made no difference to me who made them or if one had a better design than the other. Just wanted any baseball card with the gum!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1952 topps nickel pack | Republicaninmass | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-23-2016 09:23 AM |
1919 US Buffalo Nickel | Ben Yourg | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 11-16-2015 05:31 PM |
Ping ISI Nickel Irons Black Dot 3-PW LH | botport | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2015 09:53 AM |
It's 1953..and you have a nickel.. | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 30 | 06-14-2014 09:05 PM |
If I only had a nickel..... | Bigdaddy | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 22 | 01-22-2012 09:26 PM |