![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe too easy an answer but I collect raw in the VG range since it offers a nice compromise between cost and visual appeal.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using Tapatalk
__________________
Thanks, Jason Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm pretty much in agreement with Jason. I build sets (58 to 62+70) to put in binders so raw is fine. I target VG or better. Actually, my prefered grade is LG or Looks Good. If I'm happy with how the card looks in its page and I paid a price I'm OK with then I'm satisfied. Creases will put a card in the 'upgrade needed' list before any other flaw. I have no problem with off-centered cards and I have quite a few with stray marks on the reverse.
I'd guess that except for my '62 set the overall grade on those I've collected would be close to EX. There are a few exceptions due to cost (my '58 Williams is F at best) or sentimental value ('59 Gibson survived from my youth, it's in poor condition). The '62 Topps set has proved to be a challenge to build in decent shape. I suspect that when I'm done it will be no better than F-G overall. I worked hard building them and love these sets too much to ever sell them so future value isn't a concern. I just want to be able to flip thru the binder and rekindle memories of being a kid.
__________________
"When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea. Thank you very much." -Eric Cantona |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My raw 1970 - 1979 Topps sets in binders are mostly VG-EX+ probably if they are graded...but I like them that way.
My type card collections are mostly slabbed. avg no more than PSA 3 or 4 on the avg (some nicer others lower). It's cheaper and allows me to buy more for my collection without breaking the bank. Ricky Y |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks guys. Glad to know I'm not the only one. I belong to a PSA group on Facebook, where there are routinely ridiculously high grade, PSA 8 and above vintage cards posted. I feel pretty down to earth when looking at that.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 05-22-2018 at 02:13 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I (usually) draw the line at intentional damage. Tape residue, trimmed borders, moustaches drawn on players, that sort of thing. Honest wear doesn't bother me.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
?? I asked about the seemingly ubiquitous mustaches when I inherited my older brother's collection; he assured me all the players back then had them---not true?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mid grade 50's with nice appeal are a great value and nice little gems. Centering is a must for me, corners not so much.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying collectors grade (F-G) of these 4 1959 Topps | Ed_Hutchinson | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-06-2017 02:50 PM |
FS: Several Collectors Grade 1950s Mantles | j_bodensteiner | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-09-2016 01:55 PM |
Plank, Collins and Evers - Collectors Grade *reduced | Tao_Moko | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-08-2015 09:01 PM |
1971 T goldmine for off-grade collectors ~ 60% of the set! | JElwell | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-07-2014 08:43 AM |
Collectors Forensic Register = Grade Tech Services Inc.? | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 11-13-2010 10:10 AM |