![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If anyone else submitted it, an 8 minimum. If I submit it, a 5.
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice finally seeing one w/o all the black print schmack. GL with the grade.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will guess trimmed because that is what they would grade it if I sent it in.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beautiful card!
NM+ 7.5 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5.5 or 6
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As pointed out in the first thread on the pre-war board, if that is a surface wrinkle on his cap, it wouldn't qualify for a 5.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With no surface wrinkles that is solid 8.5 and could get a 9.
If a surface wrinkle is visible under a black light then your looking at 5.5. As a collector, these are favorite cards b/c I can afford them. They look like and 8 or 9 with the naked eye. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I looked the card over pretty thoroughly so I feel like I would have seen any surface wrinkle, but who knows. We shall see! I’ll post the grade when I get it!
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree. I am trying to imagine what would improve that card-- the flaws are miniscule. The area of concern for the surface wrinkle appears in some examples on ebay, at least to my eye, and therefore is likely just a printing anomaly.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. Last edited by nolemmings; 05-17-2018 at 10:52 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure about SGC, but with PSA very light surface wrinkles on 5's are more common than you would think. I've seen plenty of them.
__________________
T206 Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If Gashousegang declines or doesn’t get back to me, I’ll go to the next. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very cool; guess that isn't a surface wrinkle, just a reflection.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congrats
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS 1960 Yastrzemski Rookie PSA 6 | polishman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 08-10-2017 12:22 AM |
Buying 1960 Yastrzemski and McCovey in PSA 7, 8 , and 9 | Sean1125 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-26-2016 08:12 PM |
Want to Buy - Carl Yastrzemski (1960's) | jbernar1 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 03-31-2016 10:40 PM |
WTB: 1960 Yastrzemski Rookie | KC Doughboy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 02-02-2014 12:42 PM |
WTB: 1960 Topps Yastrzemski PSA NM -NM/MT | MBMiller25 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-19-2011 11:38 AM |