Shanus-REA suit

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

REA and Mr. Lifson were both defendants.

Ok there were 2, my mistake. But I am pretty sure Bill was inferring the hobbyists knew both defendants and he meant Corey and Rob not meaning members knew Rob's other company....Bill originally, probably meant to say "litigants". But I am wrong, there were 2 defendants. More to come I am sure....

[Rich Klein]

Since several people in the discussion in the thread are from the DFW area we can hash this out in person. And I have the ideal venue, my next show on June 9-10 at the Comfort Inn and Suites Plano East. There is a nice sitting area where they serve the breakfasts and I'll be happy to facilitate the discussion.

Rich

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Rich Klein

Since several people in the discussion in the thread are from the DFW area we can hash this out in person. And I have the ideal venue, my next show on June 9-10 at the Comfort Inn and Suites Plano East. There is a nice sitting area where they serve the breakfasts and I'll be happy to facilitate the discussion.

Rich

There's a thread hijacking for the ages.

[Snapolit1]

Nothing to see here . . . keep moving.

Can't we resume talking about suspected shilling of $100 cards at PWCC and cabals of unknown people reporting fake sales prices for items? Faceless people always far preferable than friends.

[Rich Klein]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

There's a thread hijacking for the ages.

I'd love to meet the Stache and Leon and Mdmtx have both attended. So why not take free publicity. Come on down to Texas yourself, you'd make money buying!

Rich

[oldjudge]

Rich-With all due respect, start a new thread.

Peter-Do you know if that count was settled or dismissed?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Rich-With all due respect, start a new thread.

Peter-Do you know if that count was settled or dismissed?

As I understand it, summary judgment was entered on that count against Corey.

[oldjudge]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

As I understand it, summary judgment was entered on that count.

So Corey won that count also?

[the 'stache]

Originally Posted by Leon

Ok there were 2, my mistake. But I am pretty sure Bill was inferring the hobbyists knew both defendants and he meant Corey and Rob not meaning members knew Rob's other company....Bill originally, probably meant to say "litigants". But I am wrong, there were 2 defendants. More to come I am sure....

Nope, by co-defendants, I meant Rob, and REA. I am not familiar with REA's history prior to the time when I joined this forum. I don't know if Rob was a founder, or not. If not, it's quite possible that long time hobby enthusiasts might have had a working relationship with somebody other than Rob at REA.