Signed ball question To settle an argument

[Hxcmilkshake]

Bonds with the other 2 seems almost blasphemous to me. In fact i had to re-read that. 0% desirability for me.

I also prefer single signed balls over random stars signing so the Ruth would be a clear #1

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

[Bestdj777]

The only one I'd consider is the Ruth. I'd have no interest in a ball with him and more recent players.

[Mr. Zipper]

This is clearly a case where "more" is not better.

[Klrdds]

Ruth far and away as a single is more desirable and valuable .

[dwr11]

Ruth by himself. No question.

[Lordstan]

Ruth by himself +100000000000

BUT...
If you had Ruth, Foxx, Ott and all the rest of the 500HR club on one ball that would trump the single I think, but who in their right mind would have done that.

[mr2686]

Ruth by himself all the way. If you need to see all of them together, get single signed balls and but them on display together.

[RichardSimon]

Originally Posted by Lordstan

Ruth by himself +100000000000

BUT...
If you had Ruth, Foxx, Ott and all the rest of the 500HR club on one ball that would trump the single I think, but who in their right mind would have done that.

There is a "Corner" autograph company in Pennsylvania. I heard that they have contracts with the dead. Perhaps if you find out who they are you can get your "dream ball." .