![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
BTW, this is not a knock on the seller who made it very clear that this is a reprint.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Saving “hundreds of thousands of dollars” on the card should be appealing to more than a few.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This one has the dot matrix printing, which is so difficult to reproduce. If the color was a bit better, it would be very convincing. Online, I think you’d be smart to stick with graded cards. In person, I would guess other things would look off about it.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
wow, pretty impressive.
__________________
Collection on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139478047@N03/albums |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes impressive, but reprints are still the spawn of hell. But at least he was forthcoming.
Have I mentioned how much i loathe ALL reprints? ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The only "good" reprint is one that clearly has the word "reprint" stamped on it or is printed in some way that makes it clear it isn't an original.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't mind reprints so long as it's clear that's what they are. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm still ok with buying non- graded on Ebay. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The only good reprint is one that is burning in my fireplace.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1 They have certainly caused a lot of financial hardship for unsuspecting collectors. I used to think reprints were ok but I dunno anymore....I guess if they are very clearly marked it's ok but the vast majority don't seem to be marked reprint anywhere on them.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 04-23-2018 at 07:19 AM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't have a problem with the seller because he stated in several places
including the title that it is a reprint/fantasy card but I do have a problem with it not having reprint on it somewhere. Even though most T206 collectors know this Evers pose wasn't printed with any 350 backs let alone a Drum back some novice collectors could be fooled by a card like this. As for the card itself it's better than some of the reprints/fakes but anyone that can't tell it's a fake should probably stick to graded cards or a seller you trust until you get a better feel for spotting the fakes. Evers (Cubs) [3].jpg |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are some good resources to learn about detecting fakes/reprints? | wnp22 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 09-20-2016 03:35 PM |
Good looking M101 Reprints | obcbobd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-11-2015 12:23 PM |
Get your reprints! Get your reprints! Can't tell a player without a reprint! | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-23-2014 06:08 PM |
Reprints - Good or Bad | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-13-2007 04:43 PM |
Are These Old Judges Good or Reprints?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-09-2003 09:03 AM |