![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As mentioned, they are good reprints-- but with abnormal corners sometimes and those brown lines.
One essential aid in these issues is common sense-- such as the guy is offering an ungraded Joe Jackson rookie card worth, what?, a few thousand dollars? You can often identify reprints and fakes being offered by just reading the title and descriptions and no even having to look at the pictures. If you're buying online a Goudey Ruth or Jackson RC from a guy doesn't even say they're real, that's half your problem. My old saying is "If you go into a Three Stooges movie expecting Orson Welles, that's your fault not the movie's." If you're buying raw cards such as the ones the guy is offering, I'd make sure the seller is a well known expert or veteran dealer or collector. To start off, they will guarantee the authenticity and you'll know they know what they're talking about. Last edited by drcy; 04-03-2018 at 06:05 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They are NOT reprints, they are counterfeits.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The guy that bought the 1952 Mantle for $13.49 was shocked it was a fake.
__________________
Robert Klevens www.prestigecollectiblesauction.com eBay Store: http://stores.ebay.com/Prestige-Collectibles-Auction You Tube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/prestigeco...llcards/videos My personal collection: http://yakyukai.com/ Last edited by prestigecollectibles; 04-03-2018 at 11:55 PM. Reason: update |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I hate it when that happens LOL - That's Classic
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 225/520 : 43% |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it DID have RP in the title. Which is another pet peeve of mine. Some sellers use it to designate "Reprint", yet it's hard to 'neg' it out of the search (hmmm... maybe -" RP " would help). But in this example there was plenty of room for reprint instead of RP in the title. Bottom line though, the buyer failed on 2 accounts. Expecting to get a real Mantle for under 20 bucks and complaining about a 'reprint' listed as a reprint.
Last edited by tschock; 04-04-2018 at 05:24 AM. Reason: corrected |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1983 Topps '52 Mantle is a reprint. These are counterfeits and the buyer has a legit gripe.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I consider counterfeits to be reprints. I also think reprints should be significantly different than the original. For example, the Topps official 1952 reprints say reprint with modern date and different size.
As noted earlier, a way to go after unauthorized reprints and counterfeits is copyright/trademark infringement. That would be up to Topps, but eBay could make the simple rule to remove all other than Topps authorized reprints. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking sage advice | Puckettfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 02-21-2017 02:09 PM |
Seeking advice/help... | Roofman4 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-07-2014 08:09 PM |
Somewhat new here and seeking advice | ChrisH | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-10-2012 06:24 PM |
Seeking set building advice | bunst | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 12-10-2011 09:58 PM |
I'm new here--Seeking advice | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 12-31-2005 03:33 PM |