![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for posting this as I would love someone to explain this to me as well. Also, what happens when there is no date stamp?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A type 1 original photo is developed off the original negative at the time the photo was taken(winthin approx 2 years). Type 2.. same thing. It developed later(after 2 years). Both developed of ORIGINAL NEG.
A wire photo is a product of a wire machine. They can also be done at the time the photo was taken. However, they are created in a much different way and the photo quality is not close to as good. It is done with a series of lines one after the other. How the picture is established is extreme lights to darks and everything in between on each line. Wires are type 3s in the type system. So.. if you look closely and under magnification, you will actually see the lines that compose a wire photo. Re stamps: sometimes a stamp will literally say wire photo or give a exact time the wire was received. Many times you won’t be able to tell by stamps alone. You need to look at clarity and what i mentioned above. Also, many wire photos if not trimme, have the embedded caption on the front. I wrote this on phone with voice to text so sorry if things are lost in translation. Pm me if you need more info or have other questions as i am always willing to help new photo guys. Ben
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls." ~Ted Grant Www.weingartensvintage.com https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Everything Ben said. He's the guy.
Only thing I would add is that pre-1935, wire photos were very rarely used for sports photographs. So if you see a Babe Ruth picture from 1928 described as a wire photo that is likely inaccurate. Wire photo technology really wasn't perfected (if that's the right term) before 1934-35 when AP installed a much improved system. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
so is the Mathews photo above a wire photo (aka Type 3)?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks like it could be a Type 1 photo...or at least a Type 2 IMO.
Jeff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok so how would this be a Type II if the date if on the back ? Sorry for all the questions but just trying to learn.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As for the Type 2, Newspapers kept these photos in files and would use them over and over again but in this case it would have other dates on it. When I responded to you, I was really trying to get across that it was probably not a wire photo...it was an original photo made from the negative. Jeff |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Lou Gehrig Type 1 Wire Photo 1937 ASG HR - SOLD | quinnsryche | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 7 | 12-23-2017 08:13 AM |
Photo Help Type 1 original or Type 3 wire | koufax1fan | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 02-26-2017 01:04 PM |
1937 Joe DiMaggio Type 1 Wire Photo ends Sun. 9/8 @ 9 pm CST | jdl7860 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 0 | 09-07-2013 07:10 PM |
wire photo type 1? | JoeyF1981 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 17 | 07-23-2013 10:03 AM |
Mickey Mantle Wire Photo May 22, 1963 - Type IV - AP | BigJJ | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 07-02-2012 05:57 PM |