![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have the CFL type black lights. My bathroom does not have any windows so I chance out the regular CFLs in my vanity to the black light ones. No matter what type of light you are using they work best if they are your only light available.
A halogen light works great also, especially with alterations made to black. It makes Sharpie and most other added black appear grey. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I use a black light on every card, every time no matter the cost and I only collect pre ww1. It helps pick up all flaws and alterations, it can help ID when a card has been removed from a book and other minor things.
I have a bar mounted above my desk under the shelf for the TV and a small one that goes to shows with me on my backpack. I tell the dealer I want to view it under my light, empty my bag and turn the bag so we both can see and place the card inside to make it dark and turn on the light. It will show you all sorts of things IMO. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The chemicals that fluoresce were added to paper in the WWII era, and to photopaper in 1955.
As mentioned, if a supposedly Pre-WWII item does not fluoresce, that does not prove it old, because some modern paper and cardstock do not have the chemicals. However, the lack of fluorescence is consistent with it being old-- a good sign and helpful evidence. Last edited by drcy; 02-16-2018 at 09:44 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A black light, ruler, and magnifying glass are essential for vintage collectors IMO. There’s also nothing better than an example card that you know to be genuine for comparison. I know that’s not always possible with rare or high end stuff though. Many frauds and alterations are easily spotted using these items, but unfortunately not all.
__________________
Jason |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Everything he said.
BTW, I have the same black light Steve does. Quote:
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Timely enough, I am having published in the near future two books, one a new guide to authenticating early baseball cards and the second an introductory physics textbook on ultraviolet light. The first is obviously appropriate, but the second might be of interest due to all the fascinating areas ultraviolet light is used: authentication, astronomy, medicine, biology, geology, forensics, dentistry, security systems, etc.
So just wait a month or two and they should be out. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is an example of a black light in action. The fake is a 1957 Seattle Popcorn card of George Munger. Although printed during a time when some paper stock had whiteners that caused the paper to fluoresce, none of the Seattle Popcorn cards (1954 - 1968) fluoresce under a black light. It might be instructive to compile a list of vintage post-war issues that should not fluoresce.
I discovered this fake in my collection a couple of years after acquiring it. I believe the seller dealt in good faith and because so much time had elapsed I did not pursue the issue with him. This card does not come up often, but luckily I got one shortly after my "discovery" for about half of what I had paid for the fake. ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Black lights are cheap and easy to use. I think all serious collectors should have one. That said the big takeaway from a discussion should be that a black light is only one form of detection AND not all counterfeits or fakes will fluoresce. Just because something doesn't floresce doesn't mean it isn't fake.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you everyone for your responses. Today I went to Lowe's and purchased the Rayovac 9-LED UV Flashlight for $16 CDN. I waited for it to become dark outside, because that's the best time to use it, and I went over my collection. I made a few shocking discoveries unfortunately.
![]() ![]() Anyhow, I see there is a sticker on the back of the package which says the following: WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including DEHP, which is known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov. What exactly is DEHP? Is it really that bad? And why does it only mention California? lol I ordered a cheap one from China as well for a little over $3 USD - these are the ones a majority of collectors probably use. I want to compare it to my Rayovac model once it arrives. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
black light recommendation? | RelicSports | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 6 | 08-20-2015 10:11 PM |
Black Light Recommendations? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-10-2012 06:03 PM |
Microscopes and Black Light For Sale | drc | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 02-24-2012 06:38 AM |
online ultraviolet light / black light tutorial | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-10-2008 12:59 PM |
Purchasing a black light... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-14-2007 12:34 PM |