![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't be too sure about that. People can be quite fickle when you mess with their time and money.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with Peter on this. Until other registries catch up PSA is the goose laying the golden eggs. They can pretty much do whatever they want to, so it seems.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA signed for my 45 day bulk order on January 18, 2018.
Today (February 7, 2018) I am yet to make it into their system. Still waiting......
__________________
Want List: None at the moment |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
High grading prices and long waits. It doesn't get any better than that. There are 2 other fine services out there to deal with. They get my vote.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bgs non guarantee time Is 83 BUSINESS days
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My latest PSA 30 day took 47 business days. I noticed they had a lousy monthly special in January. Figured they'd get caught up a bit, but the Feb special has a decent one. And I'm thinking they will be getting heavier volume soon as the registry deadline is in May.
__________________
Rich@rd Lap@int |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So I sent a submission of 14 Topps test discs which was signed for the end of December, not logged in their system till January 15th and shipped back February 2nd. Not great, but not bad relative to some of the other stories on this thread. Now the ridiculousness.
For those who don't know the discs only exist in proof form and therefore PSA only grades them as authentic. I sent in discs in 3 different proof states from 2 different years(, 1967 yellow/white, 1967 red, white, yellow, black, 1968 final proof ). Each disc was labeled on the back of the card saver with the year, issue, player name and line number corresponding to the submission invoice as PSA required in the "old days". Something like " 1967 Topps Test Disc Roberto Clemente, line 4" So when the grades pop - it shows that they DIDN'T grade 11 of the 14 discs stating "no spec info". They did grade 3 - 1967 Frank Robinson, 1967 Hank Aaron and 1967 Roberto Clemente. Then the shipment arrives ![]() ![]() The Frank Robinson they graded was one of 4 of the 1967 red, white, yellow, black proofs I sent and the ONLY one graded properly. They did not grade the Clemente, The Aaron, or the Koufax from the same proof lot. AND they mis-graded the 1968 Clemente and Aaron as 1967's. I don;t have words sufficient to express the utter frustration. I am waiting for a response from PSA for about 3 days now regarding both their "no grades" as well as the mistakes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Once in sgc's system, how long before grade appears online. | Andyvanslyke | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 10-23-2017 11:48 AM |
PSA submission - how long til into their system | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-10-2016 09:29 PM |
SGC order sent to old address taking a long time to forward | brian29575 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 05-24-2013 08:53 PM |
PSA Grading Contest, enter here for free | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-21-2004 09:37 PM |