![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Anyway, it's at $15.6k right now with 9 days left. it's got a rip in it and it's wrapped in an ugly card condom- but pwcc slaps "certified high end" on it and they come running.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a pretty nice rip upper left. Here's same card sold at LOTG back in 3/29/15 for $15,600
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 01-27-2018 at 06:02 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't care for the baggies either. I've broken a few out, but still have some. I've only submitted cards to SGC for grading once and these Piedmont Art Stamps were in that group. I didn't ask for them to get baggied. I assume they did it because they are so thin.
![]() ![]()
__________________
158 successful b/s/t transactions My collection: https://www.instagram.com/collectingbrooklyn/ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1. People don’t like when thin items slide under the gasket and complain that SGC should fix the problem.
2. People like the way the SGC “gasket” frames the card and makes the colors “pop”. 3. SGC then puts thinner items in a transparent sleeve to prevent the cards from sliding under he gasket. 4. People don’t like the transparent sleeve, that keeps the card from sliding under the “gasket”. 5. SGC removes the sleeve and thin cards are then framed and their colors pop Until the card slides under the gasket again. 6. Return to #1 and repeat as needed.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Seems like a stretch to label it a "High End 1". Kinda like a beautiful toad. Opposite of an ugly bikini model.
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You are correct in your assement a dimp is a spelling error of Dump and is also known as a shat! Lol
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Read the back of the Certified High End certificate. It’s nice to have someone willing to tell me whether a card has visual appeal beyond the technical grade.
![]()
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA packaging | mantleman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-19-2016 03:42 PM |
e90-1 packaging | ubiqty | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-16-2010 08:58 PM |
B18 Blankets Packaging | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 10-27-2007 09:21 AM |
To flip or not to flip? That is the question. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 07-20-2007 01:38 PM |
Packaging and such | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 18 | 05-10-2007 08:57 PM |