Guaranteed Forensic Authenticators: What Methods Do They Employ?

[egbeachley]

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere

Mickey Mantle did not sign any 4X6 or 5X7 photos for Scoreboard.

Mickey Mantle passed away in 1995; do you really think he signed photos produced on inkjet paper?

Aside from all of the hard evidence I show, I have yet to see on authentic Mickey Mantle, Joe DiMaggio, Ted Williams, Willie Mays and Sandy Koufax autograph with a COA from GFA and GFA opened its doors in Sept. 2011.

Think about it.

Ok. My bad. I didn't notice that the company stated all their material came from SB, hence the 5x7 and 4x6 sizes couldn't exist.

I also assumed that since inkjet printers were publicly available in the late 1980s that inkjet paper would have been available shortly thereafter. Sorry

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by egbeachley

Ok. My bad. I didn't notice that the company stated all their material came from SB, hence the 5x7 and 4x6 sizes couldn't exist.

I also assumed that since inkjet printers were publicly available in the late 1980s that inkjet paper would have been available shortly thereafter. Sorry

Scoreboard used Photo Lab.

[steve B]

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere

Scoreboard used Photo Lab.

And the why is that while there were inkjets around, they were fairly slow, didn't do all that well on photos even with special paper, and the special paper and the ink/printer were expensive.

At the same time, a commercial photo lab could run photos from the same negative, or more likely a strip of duplicate negatives, and the cost per photo would have been much less.

A great example of some simple checking. If the underlying item makes very little sense, then more often than not the rest of the entire item should be very suspect.

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by steve B

And the why is that while there were inkjets around, they were fairly slow, didn't do all that well on photos even with special paper, and the special paper and the ink/printer were expensive.

At the same time, a commercial photo lab could run photos from the same negative, or more likely a strip of duplicate negatives, and the cost per photo would have been much less.

A great example of some simple checking. If the underlying item makes very little sense, then more often than not the rest of the entire item should be very suspect.

Exactly, Steve.

One of the points I make in my blog is that it would have been cost prohibitive.

[thetruthisoutthere]

Part 2 of my Blog about GFA.


https://live.autographmagazine.com/p...-do-they-use-b

[gunboat82]

I'm glad I found this old thread. Saco River Auction has one of these listed, ending today.

https://www.invaluable.com/auction-l...10d80af121b89f

[BillyCoxDodgers3B]

Wow, that piece is atrocious.

[HOFAUTOS]

Originally Posted by gunboat82

I'm glad I found this old thread. Saco River Auction has one of these listed, ending today.

https://www.invaluable.com/auction-l...10d80af121b89f

There's so many of these around that they will still be on the market when our great great great great great grandchildren have kids lol