Joe Doyle N.Y. NAT'L and it's 11 "cousins"......PART 2

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by Bpm0014

Ted, it appears that my “poor man’s Doyle” is identical to yours.

Hi Brendan

Your "poor man's" Joe Doyle error card exactly matches mine. Thanks for posting it. Your card makes it 17 of a total of 205 samples of this Doyle with the "printer's mark".
That translates to 8 % of the Joe Doyle cards with this mark that have been noted in my 10+ years survey.

Brendan....please tell me which T-brand is on the back of your card ?

Thanks




.............................................^.... .................................................. .........................^ Printer's Mark




TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[Jobu]

Here is my poor man's Poor Man's Doyle (Piedmont 350).

[Pat R]

There are a few different Doyle variations that stem from the removal
of the NAT'L.

The one that has been posted in this thread that shows a small piece
of the N that didn't get removed.


then there are several examples of this variation that has the upper right
of the Y and the period after the Y missing


http://sterlingsportsauctions.com/Lo...ntoryid=42288#


and this variation that has the bottom part of the Y missing.
This one is also found on a Sovereign 350 back with an
additional matching print flaw.
Doyle missing bottom of Y.jpg
Doyle missing bottom of y Sov.jpg